[OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

[80n]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 16 July 2010 20:23, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No, he was making the point that CC-BY-SA has 100% support amongst all
> > the contributors, since we all agreed to it, and is using that to
> > suggest that nobody wants to relicense and that anyone who does needs
> > to fork the project. That's the ridiculous part.
>
> You are correct, it's obvious that there is some people unhappy with
> the status quo.
>
> But, seemingly still happy enough to continue contributing to it.

If there was really some serious problems with the status-quo then a fork or
a competing project would have already happened.



> > It's got nothing to do with Google and it's not helpful to drag them
> > into the discussion.
>
> It could have been any community that offers map editing similar to
> OSM, Google just happens to be the most obvious alternative.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100716/3d2b027a/attachment.html>