[OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Mon Jul 19 14:43:46 BST 2010


On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:30:22 +1000, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The difference here is companies like Teleatlas would sue someone for
> > massive damages if the contract was breached in the first place, which
> > would be OSM-F's only relief, OSM-F won't have a contract with any 3rd
> > party that may download data from (I like Rob's example better)
> > picking up a copy left on a bus.
>
> The FSF have found that people almost always prefer complying with
> licences to being sued for damages and compliance.
>
> I don't see why it would be different for OSM(F).
>

Then I don't see what's wrong with CC-BY-SA.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100719/86fe986a/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list