[OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

[Emilie Laffray]

On 26 July 2010 17:19, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:

>
> Consider the LGPL.  If I have software under CC-BY-SA, and I want to
> include an LGPL library, can I do it?  No.  Not because I'm violating
> the LGPL, but because I'm violating CC-BY-SA.
>
>
Could you please point out to me code that is actually licenced under
CC-BY-SA or any place where people are suggesting to you CC-BY-SA for code?
CC-BY-SA is used for creative output, while free software licences are used
for code.
Right now, that example doesn't make sense. If you want to prove something,
you should really start to use meaningful examples with real examples
instead of some really far fetched scenarios that are unlikely to happen in
the first place. I don't know of any sane project that would licence code
under CC-BY-SA in the first place.

Emilie Laffray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100726/db3a9167/attachment.html>