[OSM-legal-talk] New site about the license change

[Richard Fairhurst]

Kevin Peat wrote:
> But isn't the bit that's causing the bulk of the discussion a limited part
> of the 
> CTs, not ODbL per se?

For most people, yes, though there are a few people for whom ODbL per se is
unpalatable (I think 80n is one, but he can correct me if I'm wrong).
Personally I don't have an opinion either way on the CTs but would be very,
very disappointed if an adverse reaction to the CTs meant we lost ODbL.

The 1.2 revision of the CTs does, however, seem to be moving in the right
direction. LWG are good guys and they do listen.

Richard


-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Re-OSM-legal-talk-talk-New-site-about-the-license-change-tp5743322p5743486.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.