[OSM-legal-talk] [DRAFT] Contributor Terms 1.2

[Emilie Laffray]

On 17 November 2010 10:46, Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com> wrote:

>
> 'other such free and open licence' should change to 'licence(s)'.
>

I think we should keep the free and open as it clears any ambiguities about
OSMF potentially going rogue and imposing a proprietary licence (not that I
see that happening at all). That means that by mandate, we will always make
sure that the data is always available in a true open source fashion.
I think it is clearly important as a sign that we have no desire to move
from the initial statement to provide free data.

Emily Laffray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20101117/62ea890e/attachment.html>