[OSM-legal-talk] [DRAFT] Contributor Terms 1.2

[80n]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com> wrote:

> (*) But is this really the policy wanted?  So an individual contributor has
> no
> choice - they have to grant an unlimited licence and suck up any future
> licence
> changes.  But a third party can veto licence changes - or insist on data
> deletion, which is more or less the same thing.  Why the difference in
> treatment?
>
> If you publish your data under, say CC-BY, and then contribute it to OSM
under the third-party clause then you can avoid granting an unlimited
license.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20101118/cb9d6169/attachment.html>