[OSM-legal-talk] Best license for future tiles?

[Richard Fairhurst]

Ed Avis wrote:
> Do you mean to say that the earlier statement is true - that it's not 
> possible to produce truly public domain, unrestricted map tiles or 
> printed maps from the ODbL data? 

Yes. ODbL is very clear that there's an attribution requirement (4.3).

(I believe that the "reasonably calculated" in 4.3 imposes a downstream
requirement as part of this: in other words, you must require that
attribution is preserved for adaptations of the Produced Work, otherwise you
have not "reasonably calculated" that the attribution will be shown to "any
Person that views, accesses [etc.]... the Produced Work". At least one
person disagrees with me here. :) )

cheers
Richard


-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Best-license-for-future-tiles-tp5747363p5751683.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.