[OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Sun Apr 17 14:14:17 BST 2011


It is exactly the issue that I can't give you a copy of the prior terms 
(and the argument applies equally well to whatever the agreement could 
be construed to be for the mappers that started prior the founding of 
the OSMF).

Simon

Am 17.04.2011 14:12, schrieb ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen:
>> You do realize that you already have an agreement with the OSMF?
> Will you sent me a copy ?
> OSMF did not even exist when I signed up, so I doubt if there is
> another agreement then a single sided.
> And I still doubt that OSMF is representing the community
> in a way there statutes say.
>
> Gert
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Simon Poole [mailto:simon at poole.ch]
> Verzonden: zondag 17 april 2011 12:12
> Aan: legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the
> CT)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Undoubtably a very fuzzy one, where a lot of the terms might be
> implicit. You are simply replacing that fuzzy contract with a,  not
> perfect, but at least with most terms spelt out, new agreement.
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk




More information about the legal-talk mailing list