[OSM-legal-talk] To delete or not to delete, that is the question...
tom at compton.nu
Sat Aug 20 11:22:57 BST 2011
On 20/08/11 11:11, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> This does raise a legal dilemma though. Should the path stay in OSM and
> risk the possible consequences - or should the path be deleted, risking
> potential OS copyright infringement (as it was the OS that confirmed
> that the path didn't in fact exist)?
Surely you just leave it there but change it to access=private or
As and when you find a legitimate way to map the real public footpath
you can add that in separately.
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
More information about the legal-talk