[OSM-legal-talk] To delete or not to delete, that is the question...

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Sat Aug 20 11:22:57 BST 2011

On 20/08/11 11:11, Nick Whitelegg wrote:

> This does raise a legal dilemma though. Should the path stay in OSM and
> risk the possible consequences - or should the path be deleted, risking
> potential OS copyright infringement (as it was the OS that confirmed
> that the path didn't in fact exist)?

Surely you just leave it there but change it to access=private or 

As and when you find a legitimate way to map the real public footpath 
you can add that in separately.


Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)

More information about the legal-talk mailing list