[OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

[Hendrik Oesterlin]

"Richard Weait" richard at weait.com wrote on 21/12/2011 at 07:27:19 +1100
subject "[OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested" :

> Of particular interest are:
> - can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position?
> - is a mapper declaration of odbl=clean interesting and helpful in
> reconciling the data base?

+1 for both items

> Frederik has recently proposed a new tag, odbl=clean, to be set by
> mappers who will vouch for the odbl compliance of any object. The LWG
> would like to adopt this as policy and would be grateful for community
> feedback."

I think odbl=clean is based on the honesty of the OSM
contributor.

It is exactly the same need of honesty if the contributor does a copy
and paste of data in order to make it odbl+ct compliant. The only
difference is that history remains intact and that it takes only 0.1%
of the time to do it.

I support strongly the idea of the odbl=clean tag.

-- 
Sincerely 
Hendrik Oesterlin - email hendrikmail2002 at yahoo.de