[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[Anthony]

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Such an opt-out clause
> would mean: We're not a community building something together, we're a pot
> where everyone can temporarily put their personal contribution but remove it
> at any time.

On the rest, we're going to just have to agree to disagree.  But I
think this depiction of an opt-out clause is quite unfair.  An opt-out
clause doesn't allow you to remove your contributions at any time.  In
fact, it doesn't allow you to remove your contributions at all.