[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
Richard Fairhurst
richard at systemed.net
Tue Jan 4 16:29:41 GMT 2011
John Smith wrote:
> So statements by some people that tiles could be supplied as PD is false
> then?
Yes.
> [...]
> That fails to address my point about being able to follow a chain back
> to any attribution.
You've lost me.
Richard
--
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-CTs-and-the-1-April-deadline-tp5887879p5889278.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list