[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[John Smith]

On 5 January 2011 02:29, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
>
> John Smith wrote:
>> So statements by some people that tiles could be supplied as PD is false
>> then?
>
> Yes.

Thanks for the clarification. In your opinion, what would be the
minimum license rendered images could be licensed as?

>> [...]
>> That fails to address my point about being able to follow a chain back
>> to any attribution.
>
> You've lost me.

If attribution will also be required on tiles, you have a chain of
attribution that can be followed, if data is licensed in future so
that at least produced data doesn't have an attribution requirement
that chain is broken and it's not possible to find the attribution
page easily or at all.