[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[John Smith]

On 5 January 2011 04:37, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> That is true. If OSMF wanted to release the data as PD, it would have to
> delete any OS OpenData-derived content first.

I still don't understand how data could be accepted on that basis in
the first place, either there has to be firm statements that such data
would be removed, not may be removed, or there has to be firm
statements that attribution would be a requirement of future licenses
or that data simply couldn't be incorporated as far as I can see.