[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[Grant Slater]

On 5 January 2011 04:13, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 January 2011 04:37, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
>> That is true. If OSMF wanted to release the data as PD, it would have to
>> delete any OS OpenData-derived content first.
>
> I still don't understand how data could be accepted on that basis in
> the first place, either there has to be firm statements that such data
> would be removed, not may be removed, or there has to be firm
> statements that attribution would be a requirement of future licenses
> or that data simply couldn't be incorporated as far as I can see.
>

Our mapping is (likely) illegal in North Korea and a few other
regions. I bet we would not remove the data even if formally demanded
by the North Korean Government etc.
The language choice of language is intentional.

Regards
 Grant