[OSM-legal-talk] LWN article on license change and Creative Commons

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Anthony wrote:
> Strongly agree.  Whether started and/or spread by CC, OSM, both, or
> neither, there definitely seems to be a common misconception that OSM
> is simply a database of facts,

Well I for one still believe that OSM is aiming to be a database of facts.

> and that therefore what's best for a
> database of facts is best for OSM.

I think that the misconception from which CC is now distancing 
themselves is that "data should be licensed CC0", not "OSM is a databae 
of facts".

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"