[OSM-legal-talk] LWN article on license change and Creative Commons

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Sat Jan 22 23:20:00 GMT 2011


On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> I think that the misconception from which CC is now distancing themselves is
> that "data should be licensed CC0", not "OSM is a databae of facts".

Do you think they are also distancing themselves from the position
that scientific data should be licensed CC0?  Mike's comments seemed
to imply that they were sticking by that, and I find it hard to see
how cartographic facts are not scientific data.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list