[OSM-legal-talk] ODbl Community guideslines ( WAS Exception in OpenDataLicense/Community Guidelines for temporary file)

David Groom reviews at pacific-rim.net
Fri Jul 1 10:29:41 BST 2011



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fairhurst" <richard at systemed.net>
To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in OpenDataLicense/Community 
Guidelines for temporary file


>
> David Groom wrote:
>> We also have be mindful of the OSM guideline of substantial [1], which
>> seems to indicate that only very small extracts counts as insubstantial.
>
> I think the thing about these guidelines is that they are meant to be
> Community Guidelines: "here's what the OSM community expects of data 
> users".
>
> We are the OSM community. We're discussing this for the first time. It is,
> really, up to us to write the guidelines. Should we have one on access to
> derivative databases?
>

We could do, but then IMHO we run the risk of the sort of problems I was 
asking a week or so ago in 
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-June/006293.html

Regards

David

> cheers
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Exception-in-Open-Data-License-Community-Guidelines-for-temporary-file-tp6504201p6537003.html
> Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
> 







More information about the legal-talk mailing list