[OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

[Ed Avis]

Ed Avis <eda at ...> writes:

>>I see plenty of bad guys taking advantage of OSM.

>That sucks, but is it really the case that changing the licence would fix it?
>I thought most such cases were resolved by contracting the other party.

Interesting slip... of course I meant to say 'contacting'...

So are there cases where people are thumbing their nose at the licence, but
somehow if we used ODbL they would fall into line?

-- 
Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com>