[OSM-legal-talk] Phase 4 and what it means

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

Michael Collinson wrote:
> I am also very hesitant to have a specific date now and basically 
> support Kai's concept. Mostly the date thing is caution, I would like to 
> move to Phase 4 as soon as possible but think we can then take our time 
> getting as much ODbL coverage as possible.

That's what I think too. However, even if you are reluctant to name a 
date for it, this would still technically introduce a "phase 4-II"; that 
is the point at which you announce "ok we have critical mass, please rip 
out everything that isn't relicensed *now*".

It would mean that we should continue to tell mappers not to start 
replacing non-relicensed data even after phase 4 comes into effect, right?

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"