[OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am 6. März 2012 17:52 schrieb Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:
> On 03/06/2012 02:36 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Personally, I don't think that *verifying* their data against OSM data
>> (in the sense of flagging potential problems, as long as they don't copy
>> our data outright) would be a valid use of our data that would not
>> create a "derived database". (The database that contains the results of
>> the analysis might be derived and have to released.)
>
>
> Oops. Tripped over my own negative here. I wanted to say: As long as they
> just compare stuff and verify, I think it's ok and they won't be affected by
> viral ODbL-ness.


Really? So also this sentence was not intended and you mean the
opposite: "(The database that contains the results of
the analysis might be derived and have to released.)"? Isn't this a
kind of merge: "just compare and verify" (above there was also
"flagging")?

cheers,
Martin