[OSM-legal-talk] Combining Creative Commons Licensed Data with ODbL and Redistributing

[Kate Chapman]

So the hazard database is a scientific model, I don't think it would
be considered a fact database.

I believe there is some flexibility on asking the owner to pick a
license, but the intent is they want an attribution only license.

If I understand things correctly the produced work (a printed map)
could be licensed CC-BY no problem however. I'm just not sure what we
do about the derived database.

Thanks,

-Kate

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Shu Higashi <s_higash at mua.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>> So basically right now the hazard database is licensed CC-BY
>
> Maybe different from the intent of the owner of the hazard database,
> it won't be covered by CC-BY if the hazard database consist only of
> fact datasets.
> Though I don't know the exact legal interoperability between ODbL and CC-BY.
>
> Shu
>
> 2012/11/28, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org>:
>> On 28/11/12 12:37, Kate Chapman wrote:
>>> I don't believe that would apply to a derivative work, I think that
>>> just applies to the work itself.
>>>
>>> I'm interested to hear other interpretations though.
>>
>> It's not particularly coherent given the obvious intent of the licence,
>> but I think the anti-TPM clause applies to the work as used in adaptations.
>>
>> I don't remember a definitive answer from CC on this, though, and it's
>> not in the FAQ.
>>
>> - Rob.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> legal-talk mailing list
>> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk