[OSM-legal-talk] Attribution

jonathan jonathan at bigfatfrog67.me
Wed Apr 30 09:17:23 UTC 2014


+1 I know of a few sites who have not responded to my email.  what is 
the next step?

Jonathan

http://bigfatfrog67.me

On 30/04/2014 00:34, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> Just a reminder, this thread started of with a discussion of
> attribution, or rather lack of such. I don't think there is very much
> doubt about what the licence requires even given all the complexity of
> the ODbL, for a produced work it is:
>
> "However, if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice
> associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any
> Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise
> exposed to the Produced Work aware that Content was obtained from the
> Database,"
>
> Our suggested attribution text is already very minimal. It is not clear
> to me what reasonable objections exist against simply attributing OSM as
> we require.
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20140430/eea0ab59/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list