[OSM-legal-talk] Attribution

Alex Barth alex at mapbox.com
Wed Apr 30 12:24:34 UTC 2014


> Just a reminder, this thread started of with a discussion of
attribution, or rather lack of such

Doesn't help that the original post conflates the issues :p

On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

>
>
> Just a reminder, this thread started of with a discussion of
> attribution, or rather lack of such. I don't think there is very much
> doubt about what the licence requires even given all the complexity of
> the ODbL, for a produced work it is:
>
> "However, if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice
> associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any
> Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise
> exposed to the Produced Work aware that Content was obtained from the
> Database,"
>
> Our suggested attribution text is already very minimal. It is not clear
> to me what reasonable objections exist against simply attributing OSM as
> we require.
>
> Simon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20140430/477a669f/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list