[OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

[Andrew Harvey]

Yes I'm actually doing it. On beyondtracks.com I take OSM geometries and
adapted them into walking routes. Occasionally I've actually modified these
geometries for better accuracy against the government's CC BY imagery. I
thought this would be okay so long as I comply with both licenses via
attribution and dual licensing of my new work.

If it's okay, then this opens up a problem that my changes can't be
incorporated into OSM which defeats the whole point of the copyleft OSM
licence?
On 23/11/2015 9:33 pm, "Simon Poole" <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

>
>
> Am 23.11.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Andrew Harvey:
> > I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries
> > to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result
> > publicly.
> >
> >
> Are you -actually- doing this or would like to it or is this a thought
> experiment?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20151124/b1bde5b7/attachment.html>