[OSM-legal-talk] Using a WMS imagery with CC-BY4.0

Tom Lee tlee at mapbox.com
Wed Oct 7 15:44:45 UTC 2015


I appreciate the nudge--looks like my contact promised a check-in after a
pending call with CC HQ, but that failed to materialize. I've emailed to
follow up. Apologies, this dropped off my radar.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

> Tom, any feedback yet?
>
> Simon
>
>
> Am 14.07.2015 um 16:22 schrieb Tom Lee:
>
> I'll add that I've been in touch with CC's US affiliate and they've
> expressed interest in resolving the compatibility question (either with
> formal guidance that applies to 4.0 or in preparation for the next license
> revision). That's on hold pending their availability at summer's end; stay
> tuned.
>
>
>> To clarify a bit, any CC licenses that are ND or NC are non-open and
>> clearly incompatible with the ODbL or any open license. CC BY SA 4.0 is
>> currently incompatible, but Creative Commons could change that.
>>
>> CC BY 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 are clearly  incompatible, thanks to the
>> attribution requirements that can't be met.
>>
>> CC BY 4.0 has some open questions about compatibility.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing listlegal-talk at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20151007/f18fc36f/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list