[OSM-legal-talk] Removal of 'unsuitable' content from an OSM-related site

[Nick Whitelegg]

Hello Frederik,

OK - thanks for that. That clears things up quite nicely I think.

I have too many "day job" obligations at the moment to set it up as a
business, but the thought has crossed my mind for the future.

Thanks,
Nick

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:03 PM Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 02.12.20 09:49, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> > As I said I am paying for this out of my own money and do not want the
> > storage space to be used for purposes other than panos of walking trails.
>
> I think you have already done *much* more than can be expected of you. I
> would have removed the data long ago. Or, if you are in a business-y
> mood, offer to keep their images if they pay you some money - depending
> on what their use-case and expertise is, it might be cheaper for them to
> pay you than to run things themselves. If you're lucky, it pays for the
> whole server and then some.
>
> That of course then puts you in a situation where you will have some
> obligations, and you'd need to explain to them that they can't expect
> you to fix a bug on Christmas Eve. Which is likely going to be ok for
> them, since at the moment they rely on a service that could delete their
> images for good any time ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20201202/3a477b22/attachment-0001.htm>