[OSM-legal-talk] Warning about not mapping military areas
Simon Poole
simon at poole.ch
Wed Dec 30 11:19:15 UTC 2020
I somehow doubt that the LWG will say anything else than what is already
the OSMFs stance on such matters
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#I._Introduction
Simon
Am 30.12.2020 um 11:47 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk:
> Wiki page is smart enough to only mention where information may be found
> ( "For meeting times also see foundation wiki page
> <http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group> (search
> for "The group now meets")"
> with link).
>
> This way info is not getting outdated so fast :)
>
>
> Dec 30, 2020, 11:21 by bainton.ete at gmail.com:
>
> But NB if it says they meet on the HOT ICQ, that may be be out of
> date - I think it's now on Big Blue Button.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 10:08, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
> <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
>
> Wiki page has info where it is described,
> see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LWG
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LWG>
>
>
> Dec 30, 2020, 10:11 by bainton.ete at gmail.com
> <mailto:bainton.ete at gmail.com>:
>
> I don't, but LWG have a regular meeting that you can join.
> iirc it's second Tuesday of the month. The details are on
> the Foundation website - somewhere! (I find it hard to
> navigate it.)
>
> Edward
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 06:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:50, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have recently raised a proposal for mapping
> military bases
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases>,
> & I included a "warning" (/As always, if it is
> illegal in your country to map military
> establishments, please do not do so)/,
>
>
> Sent a message to the LWG a week ago asking for your
> opinion on this matter, but no response to date.
>
> Does anybody know if anybody from the LWG follows this
> list?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20201230/608aa3f0/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20201230/608aa3f0/attachment.sig>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list