[OSM-legal-talk] About licensing of some open-source municipal data

[Mateusz Konieczny]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3PN5zfbzThqeTdWR1l3SzJVcTg/view 
mentions "Local OSM representative" - not "OSMF representative"

That means that any mapper can do that, note that permission is not
limited to a specific mapper but applies to everyone.

"Local OSM representative" is used instead of "random mapper"
to present it in a formal/serious way and to avoid scaring away 
whoever would be signing waiver.

disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

Feb 2, 2021, 11:37 by mappinglander at gmail.com:

> Hello. I've recently seen that a municipality has given its data on > https://acikveri.bizizmir.com/>  under CC-BY 4.0 . It also has good data, I think it may be used for import, or use as a reference. However, due to its incompatibility because of CC-BY SA terms, they should sign a permission file, according to this: > https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/>  . However, due to here is not any local representative of OSM Foundation (and the form on the blog post says "local representative"), what should I do? Should someone from the OSM Foundation ask this permission, or something like that?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20210202/83f8bce3/attachment.htm>