[OSM-legal-talk] Attribution/Licensing for map derived from Standard OSM TIles
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jan 5 21:47:10 UTC 2021
Thanks for trying to ensure that everything was done right,
this puts you ahead of some major companies :)
Jan 5, 2021, 22:37 by legal-talk at openstreetmap.org:
> Thanks; that's a very helpful example. I knew I was overthinking it, and while yes none of this probably matters in practice for my map to my house I wanted to ensure I understood how it worked if I were to end up doing something more complicated one day.
>
> Much appreciated,
> Peter
>
> On 1/5/2021 4:05 PM, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk wrote:
>
>> You can publicly disclaim rights in the parts you contributed, while
>> indicating the required OSM attribution.
>> Think of it this way: If you were to get a bunch of CC-BY photographs
>> and put them together in a slideshow, you could, in theory, add a
>> requirement for attribution for yourself, for ordering the slides in a
>> nice way. But you can't say the slideshow is all CC0 or public domain,
>> because then you'd be erasing the CC-BY license and attribution on the
>> original photographs. You'd say something like, "original photographs
>> CC-BY..." You could add "I disclaim any rights in my ordering of the
>> photos."
>>
>> If this really is a map of directions to your house though, I'd say
>> you're overthinking this. Who'd want to copy it anyway?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:39 AM Peter Cooper Jr. via legal-talk
>> <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you. Maybe I'm just being too picky and not really understanding
>>> the freedom that OSM gives, but with regards to the license I put my own
>>> "Produced Work" under (assuming that's the term for this taking of the
>>> default tiles and then modifying them, or even if I just use Maperative
>>> or QGIS to build a map based on the OSM data): As there's an attribution
>>> requirement I don't think I can just put it into the public domain,
>>> right? Does that mean that I need to either use something like CC-BY or
>>> put together my own statement (my own license?) about how one can reuse
>>> my image as long as credit is still given to the OpenStreetMap project?
>>> Or can I put the image itself under CC0 and yet still make it clear (by
>>> that link to the OSM copyright page) that attribution is still required
>>> since that's a requirement of the underlying data rather than the image
>>> itself?
>>>
>>> If you can't tell, this is making my head spin, and perhaps I'm just
>>> overcomplicating things as I am wont to do.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 1/4/2021 2:19 PM, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1) That text is fine. Please link to https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
>>>> 2) It sounds like all you did was personal styling, as your actual
>>>> improvements to the area were made in iD, so I would say no, it's not
>>>> a Derivative Database and there's no share-alike obligation.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 6:54 PM Peter Cooper Jr. via legal-talk
>>>> <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello! I tried asking my question on the Q&A Forum
>>>>> <https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/78020/licensecrediting-my-edited-export-of-osm>
>>>>> but didn't really get an answer in the past couple weeks, so I figured
>>>>> I'd try here and maybe someone here can help me. I think that this
>>>>> should be simple, but the more I read through the copyright pages the
>>>>> more confused I get. It feels like how this all works should be obvious
>>>>> to me but I'm just not understanding and want to make sure I'm doing
>>>>> this right.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on making a map for directions to my house. I went to
>>>>> OpenStreetMap.org, went to an area containing my house and the major
>>>>> roads around it, and exported a box of it to an SVG file using the
>>>>> "Share" functionality. I then opened that SVG in Inkscape and made some
>>>>> modifications, like removing things I didn't need and adding more
>>>>> specific labeling around the important landmarks on the way to my house.
>>>>> For the most part these landmarks (road names, that a building where one
>>>>> turns is made of brick, etc.) are in the underlying data but weren't
>>>>> visible on the map I exported. And then I added a marker indicating my
>>>>> house.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to post this edited SVG file on my web site alongside some
>>>>> text-based directions I already have and wrote myself. While I can find
>>>>> information on requirements if I use the underlying data myself to make
>>>>> a map, or if I just present the standard tiles directly, I can't find
>>>>> information on the case of starting with the standard tiles but then
>>>>> modifying them.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) What credit text do I need to put on (or next to) the map? Is it just
>>>>> "Base map and data from OpenStreetMap and OpenStreetMap Foundation" like
>>>>> if I was using the tiles directly, or do I need to make clearer somehow
>>>>> which data is from OpenStreetMap and which edits I made?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Is there some license I need to publish this completed SVG file under
>>>>> to comply with share-alike rules? I'm certainly fine with anyone using
>>>>> the work I did, but I'm assuming (since I don't own all the data) I
>>>>> can't just put the image into the public domain and be done with it? A
>>>>> lot of the "derived database" stuff seems to assume you're doing
>>>>> something more complicated than I am of just annotating the map image
>>>>> which is part of what's confusing me.
>>>>>
>>>>> While I don't think it matters for my specific questions, before making
>>>>> the export I have made some fixes to the area near my house in the
>>>>> standard iD editor to make the map more complete and accurate near me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> --
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20210105/bfd1c04d/attachment.htm>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list