[OSM-legal-talk] Community Data License Agreement - Permissive - Version 2.0

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Mon Mar 21 22:51:08 UTC 2022


Warning: not a lawyer

It seems that problem described in
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/CDLA_permissive_compatibility
remain and it is not going to work well with incorporating
CDLA-licensed material into a larger dataset that may be
further edited.

"A Data Recipient may share Data, with or without modifications, 
so long as the Data Recipient makes available the text of this agreement
with the shared Data."


Mar 21, 2022, 14:19 by CjMalone at mail.com:

> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had read the CDLA Permissive 2.0 [1], and
> checked for compatibility with the ODbL. I think it looks OK, but
> IANAL.
>
> I've seen there was a review of the CDLA Permissive 1.0 [2], which
> seems to have come to a conclusion of "maybe". But CDLA Permissive 2.0
> is a much sorter and simpler license.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> Cj
>
> [1] https://cdla.dev/permissive-2-0/
> [2] https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/CDLA_permissive_compatibility
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20220321/eafee177/attachment.htm>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list