[OSM-legal-talk] Community Data License Agreement - Permissive - Version 2.0

[Vincent Veldman]

>From my perspective - 

"makes available the text of this agreement with the shared Data."


is why you can't use it for OSM - I think practical reasons is why this won't work..


Just my 5 cents to the matter



 From:   Cj Malone <CjMalone at mail.com> 
 To:   <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org> 
 Sent:   21/03/2022 21:19 
 Subject:   [OSM-legal-talk] Community Data License Agreement - Permissive - Version 2.0 

Hello, 
 
I was wondering if anyone had read the CDLA Permissive 2.0 [1], and 
checked for compatibility with the ODbL. I think it looks OK, but 
IANAL. 
 
I've seen there was a review of the CDLA Permissive 1.0 [2], which 
seems to have come to a conclusion of "maybe". But CDLA Permissive 2.0 
is a much sorter and simpler license. 
 
Any opinions? 
 
Cj 
 
[1] https://cdla.dev/permissive-2-0/ 
[2] https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/CDLA_permissive_compatibility 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 
legal-talk mailing list 
legal-talk at openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20220322/b66c976d/attachment.htm>