[Moderation] Rogue newbie mapper in Copenhagen

[Mark Williams]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brian Prangle wrote:
> In addition to Mark's suggested criteria which I think is a good start
> for mapping a process, I would add:
> 
> failure to respond to a number (yet to be determined) of email requests
> or responded in a negative manner.
> 
> I would also propose that a notice period be set in a final warning
> email (short - say a day so that not too much damage can be done) before
> reversion commences.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
Good point, I meant to include #1 ! Thanks. I forgot in the ramble :)

Failure to respond, I would suggest, needs a fairly small number of
contacts but spread over a minimum period, say a week *during which the
person has made edits* and is therefore not away or disconnected.

The final warning, which is fair, gives someone a chance to back down -
leaving a  pile of junk in the system. I would hope this could then be
reverted in a more sensitive way, but it would still have to go,
probably? As an alternative, the defined number of contacts might want
to come from an 'official' address and constitute the warning in themselves.

Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksLi9AACgkQJfMmcSPNh94YCwCfecEP1/tjrYkR3EjKgVCkqqgk
/xgAnA/hUvanzUCnvu4ow7Fu+AKXFplq
=s1Uw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----