[OSM-newbies] Proper village boundaries
Bráulio Bezerra da Silva
brauliobezerra at gmail.com
Sun Jul 25 01:38:10 BST 2010
Bath is mapped correctly. But supposing it shares boundaries with other
localities, it will have to be mapped as a relation at some point in the
future to avoid overlapping of ways.
The problem really is with the render. For some things it correctly shows a
label at the center of the polygon, but that's not a general rule. In
certain cases it doesn't because there are too many things inside the
polygon (but IMHO it should always show it at low zoom levels). If you
create the region and also put the POI, it will show both (if the polygon is
mostly empty at its center).
So you have two options:
- Map only the boundaries; and be patient or help fix the render
- Put the boundaries and the POIs and remove the last later when the render
is working correctly. But not all renders will ever work correctly and some
will get confused or return repeated results.
It really depends on the case. In the city I live there's a guy who uses an
iPhone and it needs the POIs, so he was adding them, although the boundaries
were already there. At first I was "correcting" him, but now I let him do
it.
2010/7/24 Donald Campbell II <donaciano2000 at gmail.com>
> I'm wondering what's the right way to do a boundary of a village or small
> town. Ideally the map will show the name and everything inside will know
> the right place to be "is_in". Now if you notice at the link here (
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=6.3608&lon=-57.5838&zoom=14&layers=M)
> there's 2 villages side by side, one marked with a POI that shows up
> labeled, the other which is defined by a boundary. I think that sort of
> boundary is a bit academic and doesn't really need to show on the default
> map, perhaps I've chosen the wrong kind, also that sort of boundary doesn't
> leave a label HOWEVER searching for any of those street names properly shows
> they are in Bath.
>
> So is Bath done right? Should those boundaries show up visibly or is there
> another way to do it that makes more sense? Do you just have to do it both
> ways to get a label to show up? Use a relation instead?
>
> Thanks,
> -DC
>
> _______________________________________________
> newbies mailing list
> newbies at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/attachments/20100724/b12a93f5/attachment.html>
More information about the newbies
mailing list