[OSM-newbies] Rendered two ways; why?

[Richard Weait]

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Isaac Wingfield <isw at witzend.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I don't know why I didn't notice that before.
>
> But now another question: It appears that quite recently, a
> considerable part of both of those church properties have been
> relabeled to "amenity: parking", but I don't see how that can be
> right. The area is certainly not equivalent to a public parking area
> (which the blue "P" icon now on them suggests); it's church property
> and intended only for church use. So why is it proper to label it as
> "parking"?

Are they parking lots?  That would be visible from aerial imagery.
You might add further to the data by including access rules.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access

amenity=parking
access=private