[OSM-newbies] Rendered two ways; why?

[Richard Welty]

On 6/13/10 2:37 PM, Isaac Wingfield wrote:
> But now another question: It appears that quite recently, a
> considerable part of both of those church properties have been
> relabeled to "amenity: parking", but I don't see how that can be
> right. The area is certainly not equivalent to a public parking area
> (which the blue "P" icon now on them suggests); it's church property
> and intended only for church use. So why is it proper to label it as
> "parking"?
>    
for non-public parking, an access tag should be set:

access=private
access=destination

or some such. mapnik currently renders access=destination with a softer, 
hazier
version of the "P" symbol. i'd probably set access=destination for a church
lot.

richard