[Osmf-talk] wiki pages

Elizabeth Dodd edodd at medemail.com.au
Sat Dec 5 22:42:33 UTC 2009

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, SteveC wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> > I've just reviewed the wiki pages for why yes and why no
> >
> > I find that the editing performed on those pages is disreputable. When
> > you have a plebiscite you have different space for the yes and no
> > arguments.
> >
> > The nay-sayers have not written all over the Yes page.
> >
> > The yes people have written all over the No page.
> No, as far as I know Matt tried to rebut a rather stupid point, and was
> deleted.
> I marked it as disputed, because there is indeed dispute.
> Yours &c.
> Steve

You didn't mark the Yes page as disputed did you?
Rebuttals do not belong on the same page.
I do not have a problem with you running a secondary page with your rebuttals, 
but your behaviour is bigoted and should be amended to be more fair.


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list