[Osmf-talk] site

SteveCoast steve at asklater.com
Tue Dec 20 11:44:49 UTC 2011

On Dec 20, 2011, at 4:38 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> There are many reasons why this logo thread hasn't worked so smoothly, but
> I'd pick out two differences. First, there's not really much community
> buy-in for a new logo.

So to be clear in your comparison here, you feel there is community buy-in for putting company logos on OSM?

When you're talking about how it's good that important members feel able to make decisions, which of course makes sense, why does that extend to putting company logos on OSM but not changing OSMs logo? Is it that the MQ logo is slightly smaller? That it's at the bottom of the page? What are the factors?


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list