[Osmf-talk] Elections: Avoid Mandate Creep
jgc at arkemie.com
Mon Nov 14 09:25:42 UTC 2011
Le 12/11/2011 21:03, Mikel Maron a écrit :
> You said that HOT is closed and self-elected, a pretty outrageous,
> untrue statement.
I agree that it may seem outrageous to some, but disagree that it is untrue.
It is so by design:
"Membership is determined by nomination and vote by current members of
HOT." (  )
> Point taken on the wiki page lacking info. We need to fix that. There
> was a thorough report on the list.
Thank you. One of Frederik's comment was that the post sounded like PR
discourse (which may be fine, depending on its intent). A way to
substantiate this was to take a falsifiable statement and show its
distance from reality.
> This list is to discuss the OSM Foundation. HOT is not a Foundation
> project. Let's move any further discussion somewhere else.
You mean that HOT can only be used as an example for "management
lessons" to the OSM-F board, but that possible problems stemming from
this management style are off topic? Fine.
(banging his head against the wall for so stupidly still caring so much
about OSM that he had to get involved in this).
"The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk