[Osmf-talk] Question to board members
steve at asklater.com
Fri Aug 24 19:37:34 UTC 2012
Perhaps if this was documented it would make it easier. It could outline what you feel are alpha, beta and production requirements.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:
> On 24/08/12 20:03, SteveCoast wrote:
>> I disagree. If we always have to wait for production ready we won't make progress. If its not ready it can be a beta feature or a limited time feature or only available to users with a beta flag set as an option. Just saying its not ready turns people away and makes everything chicken and egg.
> That's a perfectly good argument for something that stands alone, but when something is integrated into a larger code base you do at least need to try and ensure that you don't destabilise existing features.
> What I'm saying is not that it has to be perfect, but there is some sort of minimum baseline that needs to be reached.
> It's been a long time since I looked at the code in question so I honestly don't know how close it is to reaching that point off the top of my head.
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
More information about the osmf-talk