[Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] OSM : It's a shame !!!

Mikel Maron mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Tue May 29 13:28:21 UTC 2012


I'm not sure if you've missed this, this thread is moderated: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-May/063132.html
Please do not respond further. 

* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron

> From: Hartmut Holzgraefe <hartmut.holzgraefe at gmail.com>
>To: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org 
>Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:24 AM
>Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] OSM : It's a shame !!!
>On 29.05.2012 07:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.984706&lon=4.351842&zoom=18&layers=M
>> Look at Caracasstraat !
>> (among others in the region).
>that could be a case of  copy/paste indeed, the road was amongst many
>others created in the same change set, which also contains many
>  http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10345339
>The user to blame would be "CeesW" then, not "It's so funny" though,
>as you can see in the streets change history:
>  http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/144917597/history
>  http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/144917602/history
>"It's so funny" only changed the highway type of the west half
>of the street from "residential" to "unclassified", which is
>a strange thing to do for a road like that, but not a license
>violation for sure.
>Whether the change set #10345339 and other ODBL related ones
>from CeesW are indeed copy&paste changes or actual remappings
>would require a comparison of data pre and post Jan 9, 2011
>for which i don't have the tools at hand ...
>osmf-talk mailing list
>osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20120529/651cb6bb/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list