[Osmf-talk] a receding opportunity

[Henk Hoff]

Slight other clarification: Apple uses data that has been published under
CC-BY-SA. Not ODbL data.

Cheers,
Henk



2012/10/1 Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>

> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> Yes. The fact that Apple lists OSM but not the license (both the old and
>> new license require that any user of the data points out which license
>> it is under)
>>
>
> Slight clarification. Given that we can safely assume that Apple Maps are
> a Produced Work, ODbL actually says:
>
> "if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice associated
> with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses,
> views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced
> Work aware that Content was obtained from the Database, Derivative
> Database, or the Database as part of a Collective Database, and that it is
> available under this License"
>
> Our current practice is that, to achieve "a notice... reasonably
> calculated to make any Person... aware", we request a link to
> www.openstreetmap.org/**copyright <http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright>. This does a better job of explaining the basics of the licence than a
> bald link to the licence text would do.
>
> cheers
> Richard
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/osmf-talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk>
>



-- 

Board member
OpenStreetMap Foundation
+31 6 4808 8925
henk.hoff at osmfoundation.org

Name & Registered Office:
Openstreetmap Foundation
132 Maney Hill Road
Sutton Coldfield
B72 1JU
United Kingdom
A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales.
Registration No. 05912761.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20121001/7cd42140/attachment.html>