[Osmf-talk] a tired narrative
mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 8 22:19:50 UTC 2012
> I've re-read Frederik's post and I don't see poison. You quoted above,> a sentence potentially critical of the board, if you believe that the
> board took an unwarranted decision in the face of strong technical
> counter arguments.
My main point is that no one is doing this for glory, and saying so is a gross misrepresentation of the Board's decision making.
You can disagree with the decision, but assuming such egotistical motives is poisonous, and the kind of rhetoric I hope we can stop.
> If Frederik's criticism of the board at
> the time is poisonous, is your criticism of Frederik also? I don't
> think so. :-)
He's not criticizing the Board, but promoting an image of an "Evil Board", when no such thing exists. At least til now ;)
> I don't think
> that previous boards have been non-functional, I do think that
> striving for improvement is worthwhile.
I didn't say the Board was non-functional, but that the OSMF as a whole has been disfunctional. It's worth being honest about it, and fixing it.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> From: Richard Weait <richard at weait.com>
>To: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com>
>Cc: "osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org" <osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2012 4:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] a tired narrative
>On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Frederik recently wrote
>> "We are not doing the license change for the glory of the OSMF board."
>> I've been offline since this frankly poisonous post, and I still want to
>I've re-read Frederik's post and I don't see poison. I see concern
>and I see the reason for concern specified clearly. You quoted above,
>a sentence potentially critical of the board, if you believe that the
>board took an unwarranted decision in the face of strong technical
>I have no doubt that the board has been the target of unwarranted,
>poisonous critique. There was a lot of bile flung at the LWG by the
>"pseudonym psyndicate", as well. I don't see a similarity between
>those, and Frederik's post. If Frederik's criticism of the board at
>the time is poisonous, is your criticism of Frederik also? I don't
>think so. :-)
>> Before I unpack this, I'll acknowledge that it's a moot point.
>> ODbL planet has been accounced,
>I don't think that the announcement made at SotM is the same
>announcement about which Frederik expressed his concern. Hard to say,
>of course, because many of those involved have been busy at SotM. I'm
>sure we'll learn more of the details in time.
>You'll notice in other threads that there is some confusion in the
>press and community as to the exact meaning of the announcement made
>> And a new Board has been announced for 2012-2013.
>Yes. Mikel, you've served on every board the OSMF has had, if I
>remember correctly. And you even ran again last year when you had
>another year in your mandate. Thank you for your service to the
>OSMF and community.
>> But what I hope for most of all is a functional OSMF, and that's why I'm
>> addressing this head on.
>I also look forward to an improved OSMF and OSMF board. I don't think
>that previous boards have been non-functional, I do think that
>striving for improvement is worthwhile.
> There was a question about how many serving board members had to
>vacate seats before their three year terms expired, in order to meet
>the expectation that 1/3 of the board would be up for election each
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk