[Osmf-talk] Losing faith

SteveCoast steve at asklater.com
Tue Jan 15 20:57:01 UTC 2013


I applaud the aim of answering over email. The problem is it took you three months to answer one question. You are understaffed. Allowing people to tweet was already agreed to.

I'm wrong all the time, it's ok for you guys to admit that, let me and others  tweet and move on.

If I kicked you off the IRC channel, which apparently I still own, how would you feel and respond?


On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemeD.net> wrote:

> Steve Coast wrote:
>> The answer that came back is absurd. Emailing a group to consider
>> sending a tweet at their weekly meeting
> As I said earlier:
>> As per the e-mail I sent last night, we (CWG) will aim to agree any
>> requests by e-mail - i.e. if you or anyone requests something by
>> e-mailing CWG, we will aim to agree it there and then. Having it as
>> a standing agenda item on the weekly meeting is a fallback in case
>> it slips through the cracks. You quite rightly made the point (at
>> the previous board meeting) that a system was needed to make sure
>> correspondence wasn't forgotten about, and this standing agenda item
>> is a way of doing exactly that, as a direct response to your
>> suggestion.
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list