[Osmf-talk] OSMF Articles of Association - Discussion on Revision for 2013 AGM
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Mar 6 22:45:43 UTC 2013
Hi,
On 06.03.2013 23:33, Henk Hoff wrote:
> First question is: do we want to have a mechanism that prevents a
> possible "buying votes" or "hijacking elections".
I think yes, but "a mechanism" could be very broad.
If, for example, the list of members (at least with name and email) was
available to all members, then that would IMHO already be a sufficient
deterrent, because if I signed up 50 of my employees 31 days before the
election then *someone* will notice the spike, or recognize the names,
or whatever, and while I would not technically be hindered from ordering
my 50 employees to vote for me, the risk of public outrage would be too
big. Even with a secret ballot, a statistical analysis which everyone
could perform would point in the direction of me having bought the vote.
If, on the other hand, nobody except the OSMF board ever gets to know
who the members are, then everyone has to simply trust the board, and if
such a mass-signup suddenly happened then board would be in the
difficult position of having to decide whether to go public with it or
remain silent.
I am in favour of the list of members (name, email, signup date) being
available to at least all other members, and I think that control
mechanism would be sufficient.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list