[Osmf-talk] OSMF Articles of Association - Discussion on Revision for 2013 AGM

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Fri Mar 8 08:27:56 UTC 2013


Dudley,

On 03/07/13 23:21, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
> The proposal begs the question
> as to why would anyone want to be a member under the Act (i.e. having
> your address on the register) .  What would be the point?

Indeed. Being a member under the Act would only bring you additional 
obligations without additional benefits.

We thought about suggesting a change that would automatically put *all* 
members in the supporting member class and only make those elected to 
the board "members under the act" (we assumed that they have to be but 
see below). However we decided against that mainly because we feared 
that some people might then think that being a "member under the act" 
was something better than "supporting member", and we were keeping that 
from them (surely because of some sinister motive). Allowing everyone to 
choose their membership class is the easiest way to avoid such 
misconceptions.

> If we no longer had any Full Members (possible given that they doesn't
> appear to be any good reason to be one with the new proposed membership
> class) under the Act would we have a problem with the functioning of the
> company?

Our current AoA say "No person who is not a member of the Association 
shall in any circumstances be eligible to hold office as a member of the 
Board"; so even the new supporting members could be board members. The 
Companies Act itself does not, I believe, require a director to be a member.

> My other concern is we are a very small group compared with the number
> of people that participate in OSM.  Should we limit how they might be
> able to contact voting members of OSMF and lobby them in there decision
> with regard to votes at an AGM.  It seems we are also considering
> limiting peoples ability to join OSMF at short notice to attend an AGM
> so this could be an important issue in the event of a highly
> controversial motion.  This is where we do need to consider the checks
> and balances.  We should try and remain as "open" as possible.

I would like to achive that goal by increasing our membership so that 
many diverse interests are represented among the OSMF membership; we 
should definitely make joining easy and affordable for everyone.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"




More information about the osmf-talk mailing list