[Osmf-talk] hosting in the UK and "anti-terror legislation"

Emilie Laffray emilie.laffray at gmail.com
Mon Sep 9 15:52:13 UTC 2013


Hello Tom,

We do pay for the Imperial hosting but the cost is minute compared to going
to a large company.


On 9 September 2013 16:49, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:

> On 9 September 2013 16:25, Oleksiy Muzalyev <oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch>wrote:
>
>> Anyway I do not insist, it is just an idea. It is easier said than done,
>> besides the OSM is doing great as it is now. Let alone the existing already
>> hosting ecosystem in London. And I am not sure that "anti-terror
>> legislation" is an issue for the OSM at all.
>
>
> Indeed, moving servers would not be trivial. We have a number of machines,
> hosted (I believe at no cost) by two universities in London:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers
>
> Over the years our system administrators have needed physical access, as
> well as remote, for example to upgrade the hardware.
>
> I would suggest someone ask the Operations Working Group to consider this
> question, and report back on whether they believe it is practical and
> desirable to move core services to a place such as Geneva.
>
> http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Operations_Working_Group
>
> Regards,
> Tom Chance
>
> --
> http://tom.acrewoods.net   http://twitter.com/tom_chance
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20130909/3321eea0/attachment.html>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list