[Osmf-talk] How to vote to match your view
Oliver Kühn
oliver at osmfoundation.org
Mon Dec 1 20:10:52 UTC 2014
+1
I suggest to have stricter moderation on this list as we see an
increased amount of bullshitting.
Am 01.12.2014 um 20:58 schrieb Steve Coast:
> I don’t think that was really necessary, and it’s not particularly
> true either.
>
>
>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Johan & Marguerite <textline at gmail.com
>> <mailto:textline at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2014-12-01 12:40 GMT+01:00 Henk Hoff<toffehoff at gmail.com
>> <mailto:toffehoff at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Like I said, there are many ways how to introduce term limits. I
>> all depends
>> on what problem you want to solve.
>>
>>
>> Since voting in favour of Special Resolution 1 means voting against
>> you continuing your Board work it could be that SR 1 was drafted up
>> because you are being seen as the problem. Why? Well, maybe because
>> you were active in organizing SOTM's without drafting up meeting
>> notes, maybe it was because you didn't share the full member lists to
>> other board members. I wish the membership wisdom in voting.
>>
>> Cheers, Johan
>>
>>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Ilya Zverev [mailto:ilya at zverev.info <mailto:ilya at zverev.info>]
>> Verzonden: maandag 1 december 2014 12:06
>> Aan: Henk Hoff
>> CC:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Osmf-talk] How to vote to match your view
>>
>>
>> You are opposing term limits. It's not "this proposal vs. better
>> one", it's
>> term limits or status quo. You (and the rest of the Board) had a
>> week to
>> discuss and fix Simon's resolutions, and three weeks to come with an
>> alternative proposal (and it's the Board who set the deadline).
>>
>> This behaviour, "do perfectly or do nothing", is what have been
>> hindering
>> OSM development for past years, and I hope the new Board would
>> actively
>> oppose that. We are not a multimillion industry that would lose
>> stocks
>> because of non-perfect actions.
>>
>> Passing these resolutions is exactly the way to attract more good
>> people to
>> do things. It's not like Board members who step down suddenly
>> would lose all
>> will to help OSM because of that.
>>
>> IZ
>>
>> > Where does it say that I'm opposing term limits?
>>
>> > I'm opposing term limits as stipulated in the current resolutions.
>> > There are many other ways in how you could introduce term limits.
>> > The resolutions are unbalanced proposals. We need to have a
>> situation
>> > where we can attract good people to do things. Not to shut
>> people out.
>>
>> > Henk
>>
>> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> > Van: Paul Norman [mailto:penorman at mac.com
>> <mailto:penorman at mac.com>]
>>
>> > Term limits have been supported by Richard Weait, Frederik, Martin,
>> > Marek, Kathleen, Steve Coast, Mikel, Johan, Randy, Ethan, and
>> myself.
>>
>> > Term limits have been opposed by Oliver, Peter, and Henk.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > osmf-talk mailing list
>> >osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>
>>
>>
>> IZ
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20141201/63d49348/attachment.html>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list