[Osmf-talk] Articles of Association Update 2.0
Oleksiy Muzalyev
oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch
Wed Jul 30 09:34:45 UTC 2014
Hi Christoph,
I certainly cannot agree with you more that it is necessary to be
careful, that it is better to be safe than sorry.
On the other hand, in this article
http://www.forbes.com/sites/margiewarrell/2013/06/18/take-a-risk-the-odds-are-better-than-you-think/
Margie Warrell writes that: "We over-estimate the probability of
something going wrong."
She continues: "We exaggerate the consequences of what might happen if
it does go wrong. ... We under estimate our ability to handle the
consequences of risk. ... We discount or deny the cost of inaction, and
sticking with the status quo. "
I understood from the article that in her opinion there could be a risk
in not taking one, in being too cautious.
brgds
O.
On 30.07.2014 8:01, Christoph (TheFive at OSM) wrote:
> ... , it is very easy to „buy“ a vote by generating (see above)
> associated members.
> (no problem for CompanY X to tell 100 People to become a member and
> reimburse the cost by travel expenses).
>
> This does not prevent a „planned“ attack, of course.
> ...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20140730/2c7d2c99/attachment.html>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list