[Osmf-talk] Change to WMF Terms of Use: Requirements for disclosure

[Clifford Snow]

+1
 On Jun 17, 2014 2:06 PM, "Emilie Laffray" <emilie.laffray at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I really wonder if we have the same problem. Ultimately, map data is
> pretty much fact and whether it exists or not is a binary statement.
> Now, could someone slip "advertisement" like places of all shops of a
> specific brand? Yes! Do we care? No, as long as the data is factual.
> I don't care if someone is being paid to put data in OpenStreetMap as long
> as this data is correct and valid (and this is where we have the data
> Working group).
> In Wikipedia case, they have a more serious case of having to represent
> people or brand, which is something way more subjective. Will adding all
> the shop of a particular brand improve that brand? Yes, because it is
> easier to find, but no because people would be searching for it in the
> first place.
>
>
> Emilie Laffray
>
>
> On 17 June 2014 14:00, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> With reference to
>>
>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/06/16/change-terms-of-use-requirements-for-disclosure/#German
>> I wonder to what extent we should follow this. We do have similar
>> problems without any doubt.
>>
>> Volker
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20140617/89f25725/attachment.html>